結果上訴法院為他翻案，指出有關方面未有在適當時間為 Lawrence Hutchins 提供法律咨詢服務，違反了當事人的憲法權利，儘管鐵證如山，還是判了他「無罪」釋放...
Do you believe that the prosecutor and A.G. really do not know that they have to 提供法律咨詢服務 to the defendant? Or, do you believe that the prosecution dilberately 違反了當事人的憲法權利 so that the defendant can appeal?
殺一個人只判十五年，上訴後攺判無罪釋放，這叫做司法公正。正義之神的眼睛是我們替她蒙上的吧？
ReplyDelete結果上訴法院為他翻案，指出有關方面未有在適當時間為 Lawrence Hutchins 提供法律咨詢服務，違反了當事人的憲法權利，儘管鐵證如山，還是判了他「無罪」釋放...
ReplyDeleteDo you believe that the prosecutor and A.G. really do not know that they have to 提供法律咨詢服務 to the defendant? Or, do you believe that the prosecution dilberately 違反了當事人的憲法權利 so that the defendant can appeal?
多謝大家的留言。
ReplyDelete所謂「大道廢，有仁義」，只有在神的國度裡會有正義的伸張。人必一死，死後且有審判，神是不會把那有罪的看成無罪！